🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the crisis sparked by the introduction of a new 28-point plan for resolving the conflict appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A American diplomat spoke of "notable headway" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its countermove: an extensive attack of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of opposing developments captured the grim essence of the current period. By day, political struggles are conducted: positive announcements are delivered from various governments. Considerable effort is devoted on containing particular approaches. By night, the Kremlin clearly shows the world that, for them, military action persists as the primary tool for achieving "settlement".

Nighttime Reality

As military strikes developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's defenselessness was revealed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor missile launches from across the border, a capacity afforded by up-to-date information. From observation points, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been deployed to engage hostile cruise missiles flew past – advanced fighter aircraft supplied to Ukraine by Western partners.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: defensive missiles fired to intercept a incoming threat. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, presumably supplied through allied countries. Every launch shakes the surroundings, rattling buildings. The brief panic quickly becomes grim resignation: perhaps the hostile projectile won't strike its target this time, preventing destruction from devastation and further power outages.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a automatic firearm fired at a drone in the vicinity, part of a mobile-fire group – probably imported technology. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the opposing UAV – it pressed on overhead toward its target.

Intermittently, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv faced the early updates: seven people killed, devastation and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still went about their day – experiencing conflict. But those entire period demonstrated Ukraine's vital need on international aid – a need that regional partners are clearly incapable to fill in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The comprehensive proposal from Washington generated strong feelings, discussion and serious worry – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new proposal from US leadership follows the consistent cycle: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually win the battle. This trend will, certainly, endure.

Strategic Calculations

It is tempting to accuse certain parties of repeatedly advocating Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. US administration operates on a principle familiar among seasoned negotiators: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have lost on the battlefield. The US administration assumes that it is unrealistic to force Russia to abandon the land that it presently holds in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The issue is that while accepting these circumstances, American administration does little to discourage Russia, through statements or actions, from thinking that the situation will not shift further in its benefit in the near future.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Moscow is convinced that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their incentive to accept conditions that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is virtually nonexistent. There may be many attempts to end hostilities, but they will carry on as long as Russia's leader remains supremely confident in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, progressively conceding lives and land but preventing a total frontline collapse until situations evolve in its advantage.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no actual prerequisites for a truce. Now, personal considerations are coming into play: leadership ambitions to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's double obstacles – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the flag against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their priority does not shift toward domestic problems. And although their task will now be much harder after recent developments, it remains very improbable that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a mere seven days to terminate the suggested clauses of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with pacifying measures of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all served their function.

While new initiatives based on previous concepts are approaching, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and show particular unwillingness to alter the situation, if they remain united and improve their protective measures at a much faster pace. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the coming months, primarily depend on continued Western support.